Cell Phone Recycling - Reasons Why We Absolutely Must

Recycle cell phones? Absolutely!

Did you know that you can actually recycle your old or used cell phones? If you're like most people, you probably have an old cell phone or two hidden in a drawer somewhere. In a few months or years, you'll rediscover these hidden phones and having no further use to you, these old units will most likely end up in your garbage bin and thence, in your city's landfill.

But there's a better, more environmentally-responsible, even more profitable way to dispose of your old cell phones. Cell phone recycling is the answer.

There may be around 700 million used or old cell phones in America today, with approximately 125 million discarded cell phones added every year. According to a study done by a market intelligence firm iSuppli Corporation in 2007, 36.8 percent stored their cell phones in their drawers, 10.2 percent threw their cell phones away or declared these as lost or stolen, and only 9.4 percent recycled their used or old cell phones. In actual numbers, that's 10 million cell phones rotting away in our country's landfills and 37 million cell phones gathering dust in the drawers of America - and that's from 2007 alone!

Why should you recycle your cell phones?

Like other electronic wastes, cell phones in their circuit boards and batteries, contain such harmful heavy metals like lead, mercury, and cadmium. Dangerous chemicals like brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) are also found in the plastic casing of most cell phones. According to Dr. Anne Marie Helmenstine, author and leading authority in biomedical sciences, lead has been found to cause development problems in children and diminishes brain functions even in adults. Cadmium exposure can lead to "liver and irreversible kidney problems (often fatal), respiratory and bone density problems. Compounds containing cadmium are also carcinogenic."

Most of our landfills today are scientifically designed to contain chemicals leaking from the solid waste, but will you gamble the health of your children and your's on the chance that cell phones and other electronic wastes we so carelessly throw to our landfills will not leach chemicals into our underground water systems? The likelihood of these dangerous and deadly chemicals seeping into our water systems is just too high. By dumping cell phones and other electronic wastes in our landfills, we are practically poisoning ourselves.

Is there money in cell phone recycling?

Yes. As a matter of fact, cell phone recycling can be quite lucrative. You can make money by selling your used or old cell phones to recycling and refurbishing companies like Pacebutler Corporation in Edmond, OK who will pay as much as for each cell phone you turn in and will even pay for the shipping of packages containing at least 4 cell phones. The refurbishing company then turns around, and refurbishes these cell phones to be marketed to wholesale buyers abroad, bringing communication capability to people from developing countries in South America and other areas.

On a much larger scale, recycling companies like Umicore in Belgium, who process unserviceable cell phones and e-waste, are able to extract such precious metals and other materials from cell phones like gold, silver, platinum, copper, coltan, plastic and glass, etc. from these. Did you know that there's more gold found in one metric ton of cell phone and other electronic waste than 17 tons of gold ore excavated and refined through the traditional mining process? The good news is, after the entire recycling process is over, less than half of 1% of the entire electronic waste processed, is deemed unfit to be returned to the production cycle and is then just burned for energy generation.

The precious metals present in each cell phone are basically just trace amounts, so it's impractical and patently dangerous (because of the industrial chemicals necessary) for you to try and extract these minerals from your cell phone at home. It may seem like a joke, but it was in the news last month - a man who fancied himself as an "urban miner" got poisoned by the industrial chemicals he was using, while "mining" cell phones. The giant recycling firms make money by processing tons and tons of cell phones and other electronic waste.

How do you recycle cell phones?

Give your old or used cell phones to friends or family. Perhaps the most practical and easiest way to recycle cell phones is by extending the life cycle of old phones by giving these away to a friend or a family member. Most of the cell phones we hide or throw away in exchange for a newer model or after we switched to a different provider are still perfectly usable. You can give it to a friend or a younger sister, and you're sure that cell phone will have a year or two more of use before getting permanently retired. But then again, if you go by this route, you're merely extending the life cycle of your old phones. You can put in a word for the environment by asking the person you're giving your phone to, to recycle it properly when the time comes.

Recycle cell phones through the manufacturer or service provider. Did you know that you can actually return your old cell phones to the manufacturer? The leading US manufacturers and service providers like AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint all have cell phone take-back programs, complete with free shipping and/or discounts in subsequent purchases. These companies will ensure that the cell phones are recycled or refurbished in a responsible and environmentally-sound process. It's a win-win solution, too. The companies win by having access to a steady stream of recycled materials for manufacturing of new items. You win by making sure the your old phones are recycled responsibly and by getting the discounts from your purchases.

Donate your cell phones to your favorite charity. Many charitable and non-profit organizations today are able to raise funds for their respective charities and projects by collecting used and old cell phones, and then selling them to recyclers and refurbishers. If you want to start such a project in your own city or neighborhood, you can network with other non-profit organizations and even ask for material support from the recycling companies. People, even kids, are doing it. If you live near a zoo, chances are you've seen cell phone collection boxes near the zoo entrance. The fact is, by raising funds for a worthy cause by collecting and reselling old cell phones, you are putting to good use something that would have been useless, even harmful if disposed improperly.

Recycle cell phones through recycling and refurbishing companies. Selling your old or used cell phones to companies like Pacebutler Corporation is a fast and convenient option. You can actually process everything online in a few minutes. All you need to do is access the company's website, check for the actual buying prices of your cell phones' model, and request for a shipping label. Once you have the pre-paid labels, you can box and send your old cell phones to the company. The turn-around time is very fast for these online transactions, too. Generally, the company sends you your check within 4 business days after receiving your cell phones.

To summarize, we have outlined here the paramount importance of recycling your old or used cell phones, in the light of potential impact on the environment and people's health. There is still so much room for growth in our cell phone recycling efforts, as we've seen in the numbers above. But things are looking up, as more and more people become aware of the importance and the absolute necessity to recycle cell phones, we should be able to move forward in increasing the cell phone recycling rate nationwide.

Recycle your cell phones today. As the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says, "it's an easy call to make."

Warning: The Dangers Of Cell Phone Spy Software

Cell phone spy software is a rally cool or evil technology, depending on your perspective.  Cell phone spy software downloads from the Internet can be installed on any cell phone with in a matter of minutes.  Cell phone spy software then resides in the cell phones memory and is completely undetectable by the user of the cell phone.  The person who installed the cell phone spy software on the other hand has complete access to the usage details of the cell phone via a website on the Internet.

Cell Phone Spy Software Records Usage Data

This means that the cell phone calls are logged and the information is available for display at anytime.  The number called and the time that the call was made is recorded.  Even the name of the person called will be recorded if it is in the cell phones address book.   Any calls received by the cell phone will also be logged.  This includes the number that called the cell phone and the time and duration of the call.  Many cell phone spy software packages include the ability to view the physical location of the cell phone via Google Maps and you can listen in on on going conversations from a website.

The Dangers Of Cell Phone Spy Software

Like I said before, you will either love cell phone spy software or hate it depending on your perspective.  If you are a cheating spouse, errant teenager, or bad employee with a company cell phone, you will probably hate it.  If on the other hand you are a worried spouse, parent, or employer, you will probably love it.  Love it or hate it; you should be aware of the dangers of using cell phone spy software and believe me there are substantial dangers.

These dangers include things like alienating your teens, spouse or employees.  If you use cell phone spy software to monitor someone's phones, you can imagine how they would react if there came a time when you confronted them about something and had to admit how you found out about it.  This could make things worse and hurt your relationship with them.

There is also the danger of having your phone monitored without your knowledge.  Can you imagine having all of your communications monitored and recorded?  It would be embarrassing at the least.  However, these issues do not constitute the biggest danger in the use of cell phone spy software.

The Biggest Danger Of Cell Phone Spy Software

Without a doubt, the biggest danger in the use of cell phone spy software is a legal one.  In most states it is illegal to monitor someone's conversations on a cell phone without their knowledge or consent unless you are the owner of the account that the phone is on.  If you place cell phone spy software on a phone that is not on your account, you are placing yourself in legal jeopardy.  You could face criminal charges and civil litigation.  You need to understand that the cell phone spy software company's will cooperate fully with law enforcement in any investigation done against you for the illegal use of cell phone spy software.

So Should I Use Cell Phone Spy Software?

The answer depends on you and your circumstances.  That being said, here are some guidelines the use of cell phone spy software.

Don not use cell phone spy software

When you do not own the contract for the phone you want to install the cell phone spy software on.
When your decision to use cell phone spy software is based mostly on revenge.

Use cell phone spy software

When you own the contract for the phone you wish to monitor.
When doing so will bring you peace of mind and not revenge.
When you are truly concerned about your loved ones and wish to protect them.
When you need to guard your company's assets and protect it against employee abuse.
When you need to know whether you are being taken advantage of by a spouse of partner and you own the contract for their phone.

I am sure there are more points than this, but I think I have provided you with enough information to get the gist of what I am saying.  Using cell phone spy software at the right time and in the right circumstances can bring resolutions to many problems and provide you with greater security and peace of mind; however, misusing cell phone spy software can bring disaster.

Improv Everywhere conducts 60 cell phones to go off simultaneously in a bookstore bag check.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

What Is a Quad Band Cell Phone?

YOUR quad band cell phone is a cell phone that can operate on the four significant GSM frequencies as used by various cell phone service provider networks. A quad band cell phone is beneficial for you if you travel often and need to access cell phone service even when exterior their service provider's region.

Many companies that produce cell phones produce quad band cell phones, allowing them to sell their handsets to cell phone service providers internationally.

1. There are numerous types and brand names of quad piece cell phones that you can buy. Phones ranging from basic cell phones to fully functional smartphones could use quad band technological innovation.

The types involving frequency bands that a quad band mobile phone can access will be 850 and 1900 MHz bands that happen to be commonly used while in the Americas. 900 and 1800 MHz bands can be used in rest of the world like Asia and The european countries. A quad band phone will possibly function on these bands.
Significance

2. Quad band cell phones have a unique advantage over joint band and tri band cell phones. Since there will be four major GSM frequencies as used by cell phone service providers internationally, a dual or maybe tri band cell phone might only work on two or three of those companies. The quad piece phone has the ability to work on any belonging to the four frequency bands given that the cell phone service provider has a contract with the network owner belonging to the other networks.
Misconceptions

3. Owning a quad band phone isn't going to ensure that the person will automatically have the capacity to use the mobile phone on any piece in any part of the world. The user's cell phone service provider must have established agreements with owners belonging to the cell phone systems in other countries making sure that the quad piece phone can access and develop network.

Therefore the quad piece cell phone's ability make use of the different networks will depend on whether or not a contract exists between the particular phone's primary plumber and the network how the phone is attempting to access.

Most quad band cell phones will automatically swap frequency bands and try and connect to the particular nearest available GSM circle upon being turned on. Users of quad band cell phones should consult making use of their cell phone plumber before traveling to make sure that the phone could function on one more network where travel is occuring.

Some popular features of one cell phone service provider (such when Internet access) may well not function the same over a different provider's circle. Also additional rates and costs might be associated with having a cell phone over a different network. It will always be a good strategy to verify that cell phone service will always be available where that you're traveling and that will clarify any extra fees or costs regarding accessing another company's cell phone network.

4. Users are often surprised when they first start their quad band cell phone after arriving in a very new country and find their screen displays a compilation of numbers and coorespondence or the name of any local cell phone service provider and not their cell phone service provider. The reason is , the quad piece phone has changed bands and situated the nearest available network who's has access that will.

Source the coolest China Cell Phone available from China at this time! Call by eHotsale.Com or paste this url into your browser:  http://www.ehotsale.com/Supply-cell-phones_c1

Cell Phone Spy Tools Reviews | Mobile Phone Spying Apps | Full Review of 3 tools for capturing cell phone calls, texts, GSP tracking, and more

Cell Phone Spying Tools - Features - Options - Prices

There are a variety of reasons people want to be able to spy on somebody else using their mobile phone as a spy tool. Reasons for mobile phone spying applications include:

to find out if your boyfriend or girlfriend or spouse is cheating on you
to keep tabs on what your son or daughter is doing, where they go, who they are talking with
to keep tabs on employees to make sure they are doing their job

There are several options when it comes to a mobile phone spying tool. The prices, plans, and features very widely. The purpose of this article is to make sure you choose the cell phones spying application most appropriate for your needs while paying the least amount of money necessary. If all you need a cell phone spy tool for is to keep tabs on calls incoming and outgoing from a specific cell phone then it certainly doesn't make much sense to spend 0 on Flexispies Pro-X plan when you could spend only to get the information you need.

The basics of mobile phones spying and how they work

There are two types of mobile phones by tools available

hardware-based spy tools
software-based spy tools

Hardware based spy tools are most commonly devices about the size of a cigarette lighter in which you insert a cell phone's Sim card into and then plug the device into a USB port on a computer. Hardware-based spy tool will usually have a software program built into it. When you plug it into the computer that software program will load allowing you to view the contents which usually include text messages sent and received as well as phonebook access (list of contacts)

The main advantage of a hardware-based spy tool is it is actually a physical product you buy and pay for once. There are no monthly or membership fees involved. You can use the device to scan and read the contents of any Sim card from any phone.

The main disadvantages of a hardware based phone spy tool is the information you are able to view is quite limited especially when compared to its software-based counterpart and you can view the information lives were in real time.

If you are at all serious about effectively spying on somebody using their cell phone as the spy device hardware based spy tools are like trying to run a marathon in a wheelchair and your Joe from Family Guy. It will probably result in more frustration than information.

Software-based spy tools are much more feature rich, powerful, flexible, and depending upon which one you choose is also cheaper than the hardware based phone spy tool. without a doubt a software-based cell phone spying tool is a much better alternative.

Here is a list of the various cell phone spying programs along with their features and prices

Flexispy - Flexispy is without a doubt the most feature-rich cell phone spying program there is. Flexispy is also the most expensive phone spying tool with their most basic plans starting at 9. Their most feature rich plan costs a whopping 9! These prices are for one year membership. The features Flexispy offers are not much different from a much less expensive phones by tools listed below with the exception of these two tools: [1] cell phone spy bug feature - this allows you to listen in on everything going on around the cell phone with Flexispy installed. The cell phone acts as a microphone or listening device. The person does not even have to be having a conversation with somebody for this feature to work. All that is required is the cell phone is on and within 20 or 30 feet of wherever conversation is going on. [2] remote call listening - this feature is incredibly powerful and amazing. With remote call listening when the person either makes or receives a phone call your cell phone is notified with a text message. You then dial that person's phone number and you are immediately tapped into that phone conversation. You can hear everything both parties are saying with neither one being able to hear or know that you are listening. Both these features (the cell phone spy bug - and remote call listening) are not the available on the cheaper 9 plan. So although these two phones by features are quite cool and useful they are a bit expensive. However if you desire either one or both of these special features, Flexispy is pretty much the only mobile phone spy company that offers it.   All of Flexispy plans allow you to (1) view every single incoming and outgoing call (2) view every single incoming and outgoing text message (3)  view all e-mails sent and received
SpyBubble - If you're looking to spend the least amount of money possible with the most amount of features for your money then this cell phone spying tool is going to be your best bet.  Spy Bubble costs a one time payment of . This gives you a lifetime access and membership and allows you to spy on an unlimited number of cell phones. When you sign up with spy bubble you will be able to: (1) view every single phone call placed or received by the target cell phone (2) view every single text message sent or received (3) complete phonebook access (4) the ability to track in real time the physical location of the cell phone holder. You view the person's location by logging into your members area of SpyBubble and their location shows up as a little arrow moving around on a map as they move around.
SpouseSpy - This one is very similar to spy bubble in terms of features. SpouseSpy   It is also a one time payment of . SpouseSpy, pricewise, is the middle-of-the-road between spybubble and flexispy. The payment gives you one years access with no monthly or recovering fees and gives you the following cell phone spy tools: (1) view every single phone call placed or received by the target cell phone (2) view every single text message sent or received (3) complete phonebook access (4) the ability to track in real time the physical location of the cell phone holder. (5)  view all photos taken by the cell phone (6) view all videos captured with the cell phone (7) see all websites visited with the cell phone

These cellphone spying and reconnaissance tools are the absolute best ones available. My own personal recommendation is choose the least expensive one you need that has the options you need. Recapping:

spy bubble is the least expensive at with lifetime access
spouse spy is the next one up at for a year's access
flexi spy is the most expensive one at either 9 for the basic plan, 9 for the pro-plan, and 9 for the Pro-X plan.

 

If you do not need Flexispies cell phone spy bug feature or their remote call listening feature then Flexispy will be total overkill price wise and either spy bubble or spouse spy will work fine for you and allow you to save a ton of money.

LAWRENCE: Cell phone people inhabit artist's world
A cell phone can be used for much more than making calls.
Read more on The Lawrence Ledger

How To Track a Stolen Cell Phone

GPS track the exact location of a stolen cell phone

A stolen cell phone is a terrible thing. Most decent smart phones today like Blackberries, Android, IPhone are not cheap cell phones. At the very least installing some GPS tracking software on your cell phone will protect you in case the unthinkable happens. It may even help you get the crook!

Fortunately the process of how to track a stolen cell phone is actually very simple, fast and easy!

Unfortunately if your cell phone has already been stolen and the tracking software is not installed there is no way you'll be able to recover it. In order to track a stolen cell phone and find its exact location a cell phone tracking software for tracking a stolen phone must be on the cell phone previous to it being stolen.

>> Click Here to Start Tracking a cell phone so if it gets stolen you will find it <<

How the process of tracking a stolen cell phone works

In order to track a stolen cell phone you install a small software program on it. The process of GPS tracking a cell phone in case it gets lost or stolen is actually a membership you sign up for.

Once you sign up you are sent a welcome e-mail with information like your login username and password and the web address for this GPS tracking program. You take the phone you want to track and download the small program to it. You then shutdown and restart the phone.

From that moment on that small software application will emit a silent signal every time the geographical position of the cell phone changes. So as the person with the cell phone moves around and goes places this information gets sent to the web server.

At any time you wish, 24 hours a day, seven days a week you can logon to your members area from any web browser and track the exact location of the cell phone.

Other benefits of tracking a cell phone...

This GPS tracking software for cell phones is great for tracking a stolen cell phone however there are many other benefits and uses for this GPS cell phone tracking program:

you can find your cell phone if it gets lost
do you have a boyfriend or girlfriend you think maybe cheating on you or lying about where they go? install the tracking software on their phone
want to keep track of your kids and where they go? Install this tracking software on their cell phones.

How much does it cost to track a stolen cell phone?

To become a member so you can track a cell phone in case it gets lost or stolen is surprisingly inexpensive and affordable. You pay a one-time fee of just . This gives you a lifetime access!! That's right this one time fee gets you lifetime access... never again worry about a lost or stolen cell phone in addition you can track an unlimited number of cell phones.

Additional tracking a stolen cell phone links

Mobile Tracking Software Spouse Spy
In this article we take out the microscope and look closely at what you get with SPOUSE SPY cell phone tracking and spy software. Spouse Spy costs for a year of full, unrestricted access. Spouse also seems to have more features than most of the o

5 Cell Phone Spy And Tracking Program Prices And Information
In this article I will be discussing five of the most popular mobile phone spying and tracking tools, their features, and prices. This includes Flexispy, SpyBubble, SpouseSpy, MobileSpy, and PhoneBeagle. Which mobile phone spying app is the righ

Cell Phone Spy Gadgets | SpyGadgets Detect Infidelity | Cell Phone Spy Captures Phone Calls | Cell Spy Intercepts Text Messages

Cell Phone Spy Gadgets

Cellphone spy gadgets are specifically designed to intercept all communications, events,  and activities that originate from a target cell phone. The most common use for cellphone spying technology is to catch a cheating boyfriend or girlfriend or spouse. Hiring a private investigator is an option. This used to be the only option and an expensive one at that. Ever since the invention of various cell phone spy tools a private investigator is no longer necessary.

In this article I will be talking about several different types of cell phone spy gadgets, their strengths and weaknesses, their cost, and how you can install your own cell phones by mechanism to get started immediately.

Software based cell phone spy gadgets

Software spy tools are basically small applications you download and install to the target cell phone. An example of such a product and one of the most popular ones because of its low cost is cell phone spy bubble. These software-based spy gadgets for mobile phones install very quickly and easily. The exact features vary slightly on each of the different software based cell phone spy tools. The information and I'll be providing a low is based specifically on cellphone spybubble.

Once installed you log into a members area from any computer, select the cell phone you wish to view activity on, select the time period you want to view activity on that cell phone for, and you will be presented with several screens showing you a variety of information about that cell phone including:

All calls to the cell phone, both incoming and outgoing, the time of all the calls, the duration of the calls, and the phone numbers involved.
all text messages sent and received, the time of the text message, the exact message, phone numbers involved.
full access to the cell phone's phonebook.
The ability to track the holder of the cell phones physical location pinpointed on a map. this information is provided in real time which means as the cell phone owner moves around and changes his location you view that movement on a map.

When it comes to software based cell phone spying applications, like the before described cell phone spy bubble, there are generally two types:

Cell phone spy apps that cost a monthly membership fee. usually these kinds of cell phone spy apps have different price plans. For the lowest monthly fee which is usually around per month you are allowed access to minimal information like perhaps just incoming and outgoing phone calls. The more expensive plans of around per month give you access to everything.
Cell phone spy apps that cost a one time fee for membership that lasts either a year or lifetime. cell phone spy bubble falls under this category which is one of the reasons why it is so popular. You are also allowed to track unlimited number of cell phones. The membership fee is a one time payment of .

Physical cell phone spy gadgets

The way physical cell phone spy gadgets operate is a device reads the cell phones in card. The Sim card being the memory card for the cell phone. The Sim card is similar to the hard drive on your computer. It contains a history and his history gets viewed with the Sim card reader. The Sim card readers are about the size of a cigarette lighter. The way they operate is:

Open the back of the cell phone and remove the Sim card.
Insert the Sim card into the physically based cellphone spy gadget.
Insert the spy gadget into a computer's USB slot. Most of these physical cell phone spy tools will have a built-in software program so as soon as you plug the spy device into the computer's USB port the built-in software application launches in a tabbed interface each tab allowing you to view different types of data that is stored on the cell phones SIM card. These gadgets cost roughly 0-5. Cell Phone Spy is the name of the very popular and frequently used physically based cell phone spy tool.

Although there are a variety of different versions of software-based spy gadgets as well as physically based spy gadgets the two I have discussed here (cellphone-spybubble & cell-phone-spy) in this article are the most practical for most people because they provide most all of the features even the most expensive cell phones buying tools do at very low prices.

Cell Phone Site Helps Consumers Save Money
About 66 percent of cell phone users are paying for coverage they don't use because they're afraid of overage charges, according to research by a Chicago Utility Board.
Read more on WSMV Nashville

Your Cell Phone Is A Homing Beacon

Last night was a pretty typical weeknight at my home, I drove home from work
and filled up with gas before I got home, I left my house again at around 5:30
to take my son to his Karate lesson. While I was out I stopped by the local
library to return some books and then swung over to the dry cleaners to pick up
my shirts and slacks and some stuff for my wife. I picked up my son from his
lesson and we stopped off at the grocery store to pick up some bread and milk on
our way back to the house.

Click to Get Best Reverse Phone Number Trace Service

Now, you aren’t the first people to know my whereabouts that night. Because I
had my cellular phone with me, the cell phone company that provides my cellular
services knew where I was at the entire time. They tracked me with my cellular
telephone.

How is this possible?

It is possible because people who use their cell phone need to be able to make a
call whenever and wherever they may be located at the time they dial the number
on their phone. Therefore, the cellular companies must be able to route the call
to the nearest cellular tower, which in turn sends your call to the satellite in
space, which sends your signal to the person you are calling. The tower that
handled the call is typically logged (and stored indefinitely) on the wireless
provider's computers, though it's not noted on the customer's monthly bill. In
order for the cell phone company to know what tower you are at, they must be
able to track the signal from your cell phone when it is on.

In the expanded age of advanced communication and the literally thousands of
issues of privacy that it has since spawned, many people would be horrified to
learn that they can be tracked by the phone company via their mobile phone. The
phone companies claim this is a integral part of the service they provide,
privacy advocates say that this is just another way large corporations have
invaded our lives.

Wading into the fray over this controversy concerning your cell phone is another
larger and important player: law enforcement. Law enforcement agencies are now
utilizing the technology of tracking cellular signals to catch criminals and
terrorists. A few cases of dangerous criminals being tracked and caught while on
their telephones have been documented and law enforcement is now fighting with
the cellular companies to ensure its continued use.

Have we lost our privacy by cell phone tracking or have we just gained a
valuable tool for law enforcement to use in keeping us safe? Do the cell phone
companies need to know where you are in order to provide their service, or have
they found, as some privacy advocates claim, a backdoor into your life, your
locations, your shopping habits?

Part One: Mobile 911.

According to the TechTV Show “Talkback”, Cell phones show where you are, and
that is simply part of their design. Without the ability to pinpoint where the
signal from your phone is coming from, calls could never be connected. Because
cell phones decry the use of wires, and the users making the calls are often on
the move, the call and the receiving signal are not at a fixed location.
Therefore, the signal from the cell phone must be tracked.

Cell phone service areas are divided into "cells," each of which is serviced by
a base station. When you make a call, your cell phone selects the strongest base
station it can find, which is usually the closest station to you.

If you move out of the coverage of one base station, your phone switches to the
next strongest available base station (which usually means you move into a new
cell). The system always knows your location relative to the nearest cell.

This occurs even when your phone is on but not being used. For efficiency's
sake, an idle cell phone sends out a message on the access channel so that the
system will know where to direct the page if you get an incoming call. The
system knows where you are. In an urban area, each tower covers an area of
approximately 1 to 2 square miles, so a caller's general location is fairly easy
to pinpoint.

The proliferation of cellular phones and their usage gave birth to a very unique
problem: How would emergency operators track callers who called 911 on their
mobile phone? Dialing 911 from a traditional, wire-based telephone, allowed the
operator to track where the call was being placed, so that an emergency response
could be sent. On mobile phones, the people calling in the emergency had no idea
where they were, and the 911 operators had no way of exactly pin pointing where
the calls where originating.

Enter e911. According to the web site “Webopedia” , E911 is “short for Enhanced
911, a location technology advanced by the FCC that enables cellular phones to
process 911 emergency calls and enable emergency services to locate the
geographic position of the caller. When a person makes a 911 call using a
traditional phone with ground wires, the call is routed to the nearest public
safety answering point (PSAP) that then distributes the emergency call to the
proper services. The PSAP receives the caller's phone number and the exact
location of the phone from which the call was made. Prior to 1996, 911 callers
using a mobile phone would have to access their service providers in order to
get verification of subscription service before the call was routed to a PSAP.
In 1996 the FCC ruled that a 911 call must go directly to the PSAP without
receiving verification of service from a specific cellular service provider. The
call must be handled by any available service carrier even if it is not the
cellular phone customer's specific carrier. Under the FCC's rules, all mobile
phones manufactured for sale in the United States after February 13, 2000, that
are capable of operating in an analog mode must include this special method for
processing 911 calls. ”

In an article entitled “How cell phones reveal your location” published on the
Slate web site, with e911, emergency operators were able
to track calls from wireless phones in less to one or one half of a mile from
where the call originated. The technology was so successfully that the
government made it a law that all cellular phones carry the technology that
enables calls to be tracked. This law is called the Wireless Communications and
Public Safety Act of 1999 (911 Act) and signed into law by President Clinton on
October 26, 1999. According to the law, 95 percent of all cell phones must be
E911 compliant by the end of 2005.

In compliance with the new law, and to better improve the service with its
customers, many cell phone handsets are now equipped with Global Positioning
System chips, which determine a caller's coordinates by receiving signals beamed
down from a satellite array. The chip factors together the signals' different
arrival times to calculate the phone's coordinates, using a mathematical process
known as trilateration. At present, however, GPS data is typically not recorded
for non-emergency purposes, unless the user has explicitly signed up for a
location-based service.

Part Two: The Hacker and the Terrorist

Kevin Mitnick was a hacker. That is to say, he was king of all the hackers.
Mitnick, "America's Most Wanted Computer Outlaw," eluded the police, US
Marshalls, and FBI for over two years after vanishing while on probation for his
1989 conviction for computer and access device fraud. His downfall was his
Christmas 1994 break-in to Tsutomu Shimomura's computers in San Diego,
California. Shimomura just happened to be the head of computing technology at
the San Diego Super Computer Center. Less than two months after having his
computers hacked, Shimomura had tracked Mitnick down after a cross-country
electronic pursuit. Mitnick was arrested by the FBI in Raleigh, North Carolina,
on February 15th, 1995.

Mitnick was charged in North Carolina with 23 counts of access device fraud for
his activities shortly before his arrest. In California, he was charged with an
additional 25 counts of access device, wire, and computer fraud. On March 16,
1999, Mitnick plead guilty to five of these counts and two additional counts
from the Northern District of California. He was sentenced to 46 months and
three years probation. He was released from prison on January 21, 2000, being
eligible for early release after serving almost 60 months of his 68 month
sentence.

How was the FBI able to capture "America's Most Wanted Computer Outlaw"? By
tracking down a signal from his cell phone.

Luke Helder was going to set off some bombs. Specifically, he was going to set
off bombs in mailboxes across the United States until the locations of his bombs
made a “smiley face” pattern across the map of the U.S. He probably would have
accomplished his morbid feat had he not made one crucial mistake; he turned on
his cell phone.

According to USA Today, as soon as he activated it, FBI agents quickly
triangulated his position between two rural towns and had him in handcuffs
within an hour, according to Nevada authorities. The fact that another motorist
spotted Helder in passing helped authorities, but the cell phone signal was a
dead giveaway

"We got a call from the FBI at approximately 3:20 p.m. that the cell phone that
(Helder) had been known to have had been activated somewhere between Battle
Mountain and Golconda," said Maj. Rick Bradley of the Nevada Highway Patrol. "We
started hitting Interstate 80."

Bradley said tracking down Helder without the pinpoint location provided by the
FBI would have been tougher, given the sprawling region.

"It's really a rural area. There's not that much police presence," Bradley said.
Cell phone triangulation is a well-known tracking method within the wireless
industry, said Michael Barker, an equipment sales manager for Cell-Loc, based in
Calgary, Alberta. His company provides tracking services to help people who are
incapacitated and unable to dial for help.

and out of cell tower range.

According to Slate, Location data extrapolated from tower records is frequently
used in criminal cases. It was vital, for example, to the prosecution of David
Westerfield, who was convicted of murdering 7-year-old Danielle van Dam in San
Diego. The killer's cell-phone usage revealed a bizarre travel pattern in the
two days following the girl's disappearance, including a suspicious trip to the
desert. In cases like this, wireless providers will not release a user's records
without a court order, save for rare instances in which a kidnapping has taken
place and time is of the essence.

Domestic crime is not the only arena of law enforcement that is utilizing the
tracking of mobile phone signals, the FBI and CIA have been using this technique
in an effort to capture public enemy number one: Osama Bin Laden.

Author Dan Campbell, writing in the October 2001 issue of Telepolis Magazine,
describes how the world’s most wanted man, coordinated his attacks via his
mobile phone.

“Between 1996 and 1998, when the America's embassy in Kenya was bombed, the FBI
found that Osama bin Laden and his staff had spent nearly 40 hours making
satellite phone calls from the mountains of Afghanistan. The calls, which can be
sent and received from a special phone the size of a laptop computer, were
relayed via a commercial satellite to sympathizers in the west.

Click to Get Best Reverse Phone Number Trace Service

The satellite phone appears to have been a huge convenience for the world's most
wanted terrorist. He was billed for thousands of minutes of use over two years,
those records indicate, and used it to issue a fatwa in February 1998 that
called on Muslims to kill Americans, including civilians, anywhere in the world.
Even now, as US forces move in for the kill, bin Laden's satellite phone has not
been cut off. But calls to the terrorist leader are going unanswered. His
international phone number - 00873 682505331 - was disclosed during a trial,
held in New York earlier this year. Calls to his once-active satellite link now
hear only a recorded messages saying he is "not logged on". “

Indeed, when bin Laden associates went to trial in April on charges of bombing
U.S. embassies in Africa, the prosecution used billing records for calls from
that phone to connect them to bin Laden--but not intercepts of conversations.

Apparently, the FBI are not the only individuals aware of the fact that the
tracing of mobile phone signals can be used to track down an individual’s
location. With American forces closing in on him during the battle of Tora Bora
in late 2001, Osama bin Laden employed a simple trick against sophisticated
United State spy technology to vanish into the mountains that led to Pakistan
and sanctuary.

According to CBS News, A Moroccan who was one of bin Laden's long-time
bodyguards took possession of the al-Qaeda leader's satellite phone on the
assumption that US intelligence agencies were monitoring it to get a fix on
their position, said senior Moroccan officials, who have interviewed the
bodyguard, Abdallah Tabarak.

Tabarak moved away from bin Laden and his entourage as they fled, using the
phone to divert the Americans and allow bin Laden to escape. Tabarak was later
captured at Tora Bora in possession of the phone.

The use of Cell phone triangulation and the tracking of other mobile signals
appear to be an effective weapon for law enforcement, one that many agencies are
going to be reluctant to give up. But does the use of technology come at a
price: the sacrifice of privacy and civil rights of the people using mobile
technology.

Part Three: Cell Phone Commercials

The ability to track a person using their cell phone has not been lost on
marketing professionals looking to find a new avenue into consumer buying habits
and preferences. The ability to track individuals’ movements through their
mobile signal has very appealing commercial potentials. For example:

? Your phone will be able to tell you where the nearest hospital, shopping mall,
or McDonald's is located

? Merchants could automatically send you location-based advertising and special
offers when their technology senses you're near their stores

? If you've pre-loaded their phone numbers and personal information, your phone
could alert you when a friend or family member is in the area

“Advertisers are eager to use location services to alert you when you pass near
a store that might be of interest. Such services are likely in some form, but
carriers are proceeding cautiously. They're aware you may not want to see ads
for McDonalds every time you pass by the golden arches. Carriers don't want to
annoy users because it's so easy to switch providers”, says Allen Nogee, a
senior analyst at Cahners In-Stat Group said on the CNN web site.

The idea of advertisers and law enforcement knowing where you are at any given
moment and where you have been has naturally rubbed privacy-advocate groups the
wrong way. While there is some upsides for the use of this technology, privacy
groups say the potential for abuse of this technology is very high and very real
and they would like to see some provisions built into cell-phone tracking laws
that allow for the privacy of the consumer not to be compromised.

"There certainly need to be better emergency procedures [for cell-phone calls],"
says David Sobel, general counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center
in Washington, D.C during an interview with ABC news. "But once the technology
exists, there has to be some way for users to control how the info can be used."

Sobel says while the FCC mandated the E911 program, federal legislators haven't
put into place how that information may be used or who would have access to it.
"The Justice Department and FBI do routinely get information from cell-phone
service providers," says Sobel. But, "There are lingering question on what the
legal standard is to be used to get location information from cell-phone
providers. There is nothing in federal law that addresses that issue.”

According to Sobel, another large privacy issue that might be at stake is not
only the information that is being delivered by using this technology, but the
technology itself might be violating the privacy of mobile communications just
by the way the technology works.

“The e911 rules enacted by the Federal Communications Commission govern the
emerging form of telecommunications known as "packet mode" communication. Law
enforcement agencies already have the authority to demand information that
identifies a phone call as long as it is separate from the call's contents.
However, with packet-mode communication technology, data containing the numbers
cannot be separated from data containing phone conversations. Thus when police
agencies demand phone number data, phone service providers will have to give
them data containing conversations as well,” said Sobel.

Sobel and lawyers from two other organizations are asking the U.S. Court of
Appeals in Washington, D.C., to block the FCC rules. "The FBI is seeking
surveillance capabilities that far exceed the powers law enforcement has had in
the past and is entitled to under the law," Sobel said.

Similar legislation for the ability to track movements using mobile technology
has met with stiff resistance in other countries. According to ZDNET UK 
in the United Kingdom, civil liberties advocates are
outraged at the implications of the newly passed Regulation of Investigatory
Powers Act, which could allow British law enforcement agencies to trace the
movements of mobile phone users with a minimum of accountability. Privacy
advocates have vowed to have this law over-turned in this country, but in the
meantime, the British government plans to fully extend and incorporate this law
into British law enforcement, no matter what privacy groups say.

"The whole point of RIP (the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act) is to
update surveillance," a spokeswoman from the British Home Office said. "If you
haven't broken the law then you've nothing to fear."

Conclusion: Cell Phone Spam?

Law enforcement agencies, already beleaguered by an out of control handgun
problem and a across the board rise in crime in the United States, coupled with
the fact that they must now deal with the horrifying specter of terrorism in
their cities, will not be too quick to give up a powerful new weapon in catching
criminals, especially not one that will essentially tell them where they are
exactly. Any fight that privacy groups may put up will ultimately prove to be
futile to lawmakers in Congress, who want to be seen as giving law enforcement
every chance they can to be effective.

However, privacy groups have a legitimate point in their fears that a technology
of this sort is ripe to be exploited unless the lawmakers take action to limit
the very personal data offered by this tracking technology. Email is a perfect
example of a technology that, in its infant stages, was seen as revolutionary
new form of communication. Now, email systems are so overloaded with spam coming
in from not only the United States but also from Russia and Nigeria, that
congress has acted to implement new laws to stem the tide.

Cell phones now have the ability to send and receive photographs, how much
longer will it be before advertising, in full color begins to find its way to
your telephone? The outrage of having “cell-phone spam” may be so great that he
consumer uproar will cause any type of mobile technology to be severely limited
by law, perhaps even stripping out some of the positive aspects such as those
used by law enforcement.

Click to Get Best Reverse Phone Number Trace Service

Cell Phones And Brain Cancer

The tumor was on the same side of the head where she held her cell phone and was shaped like the cell phone antenna. Cell Phones And Brain Cancer The case got widespread media attention and was featured in CNN's Larry King show.

Although the claim was dismissed by the court due to lack of sufficient evidence, it was a public relations nightmare for the wireless industry. It also marked the beginning of the global search for a definitive answer to the question: are cell phones safe or not? Does it cause cancer and other degenerative diseases? Brain cancer is up 25% since cell phones became popular. Every year, there are 183,000 more cases in the US alone. Some health experts say there's a link with cell phone use, but is there proof?

In an effort to diffuse the negative publicity from the high-profile lawsuit, the cell phone industry itself funded a million dollar research program to prove that cell phones are safe. After 6 years of intensive research, however, the results were not what they were looking for. Dr. George Carlo, the chief research scientist of the program, found evidence that cell phones pose some health risks, possibly even cancer.

The first evidence of cancer link that shook the cell phone industry came in 1997. Dr. Michael Repacholi and his colleagues from the Royal Adelaide Hospital in South Australia reported that long-term exposure to the type of radiation that comes from digital cell phones caused an increase in the occurrence of lymphoma in mice. The study received widespread international media attention because it was the first time that cancer has been linked to the cell phone in a well-conducted study.

THR RED FLAGS: SOLVING THE CANCER PUZZLE
In order to show a link between cell phone radiation and cancer, let's look at several studies Dr. Carlo investigated that made him blow the whistle, so to speak. These red-flag findings provide the pieces that fit together to form the cancer picture:

- DNA Damage in Human Blood Studies
- Breakdown in the Blood-Brain Barrier
- Studies of Tumors in People Who Use Cell Phones
- Studies of Cell Phone Radiation Dosage and Response

DNA DAMAGE IN HUMAN BLOOD
All tumors and all cancers are the result of genetic damage. Most often that damage includes the formation of micronuclei--fragments of chromosomes that form membranes around themselves and appear under a microscope as additional nuclei in blood cells (which normally have just a single nucleus). The relationship between micronuclei and cancer is so strong that doctors around the world test for their presence to identify patients likely to develop cancer. The presence of micronuclei indicates that the cells can no longer properly repair broken DNA. This deficiency is considered to be an indication of an increased risk of developing cancer.

- In December 1998, Drs. Ray Tice and Graham Hook of Integrated Laboratory Systems in North Carolina have shown that blood cells exposed to cell phone radiation suffer genetic damage in the form of micronuclei. In their studies, DNA and chromosome damage in human white blood cells occurred when exposed to signals from all types of phones--analog, digital, and PCS. Damage was shown even from signals occurring at a SAR level below the government's "safety" guideline.

- Using different methods, the above finding was confirmed by Dr. Joseph Roti Roti of Washington University in St. Louis in 2000. His research showed that human blood cells exposed to radiation at wireless phone frequencies did indeed develop genetic damage, in the form of micronuclei. This finding received a lot of notice because Dr. Roti Roti is a prominent scientist who does hiw work under funding by Motorola Inc.

This has a very serious implication. If cell phone radiation encourages the formation of micronuclei in blood cells, and micronuclei are said to be "biological markers" for cancer, then based on these studies alone cell phone use could be said to increase the risk of cancer.

BREAKDOWN IN THE BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER
The blood brain barrier is a special filter in the blood vessels of the brain that keeps dangerous chemicals from reaching sensitive brain tissue and causing DNA breaks and other damage.

- In 1994 and again, in 2002, Dr. Leif Salford from Lund University in Stockholm, Sweden found in his studies that rats exposed to cell phone radiation showed a breakdown in the blood brain barrier, as well as areas of shrunken, damaged neurons.

Lung Cancer Secrets Revealed Click here

The micronuclei studies of Tice, Hook and Roti Roti and the blood-brain findings of Salford provide a two-step explanation for how cancer could be caused by cell phone radiation.

Step One: A leakage or breakdown in the blood brain barrier would provide a pathway for cancer-causing chemicals in the bloodstream (from tobacco, pesticides, air pollution, etc.) to leak into the brain and damage sensitive brain tissue that would otherwise be protected. These chemicals could break the DNA in the brain or cause other harm to reach those cells.

Step Two: While a number of studies showed that cell phone radiation by itself does not appear to break DNA, the micronuclei findings suggest that they do impair the DNA repair mechanisms in brain cells. Micronuclei result from a breakdown of the cell's ability to repair itself. If the brain cells become unable to repair themselves, then carcinogenesis--the creation of tumors--induced by chemical toxins could begin.

DNA carries the genetic material of an organism and its different cells. Any damage that goes unrepaired affects the future generation of cells. The change has procreated and this mutation is seen as a possible cause of cancer.

TUMORS IN PEOPLE WHO USE CELL PHONES
Epidemiological studies, performed by different investigators using different methods, show some evidence of an increased risk of tumors among people who use cellular phones.

- In 1998, Dr. Ken Rothman of Eidemiology Resources, Inc. in Newton, Mass., did a study showing that users of handheld cell phones have more than twice the risk of dying from brain cancer than do car phone users--whose antennas are mounted on the body of the car, far removed from the users' heads.

- In 1998, Joshua Muscat, a research scientist from the American Health Foundation, showed in his study a doubling of the risk of developing neuro-epithelial tumors on the outside of the brain among cell phone users, particularly on the side of the skull where cell phone antennas are held during calls.

- Muscat also showed in another study that people who have used cell phones for six years or more have a 50-percent increase in risk of developing acoustic neuroma, a benign tumor of the nerve that controls hearing and extends from the ear to the brain. Acoustic neuromas can cause hearing loss and can be life-threatening if untreated.

This was confirmed in a separate study in Stockholm, Sweden by Anders Ahlbom in 2004 and sponsored by the World Health Organization (WHO), which finds that people who have used cell phones, this time for at least 10 years, may have an increased risk of developing acoustic neuroma.

- In a study also requested by WHO, researchers headed by Dr. Lennart Hardell of the Orebro Medical Center in Sweden examined 1,617 patients aged between 20 and 80 who had been diagnosed with a brain tumour between 1997 and 2000. They were then compared to healthy people. Those who used cell phones for less than 10 years faced a 20% higher risk of developing brain cancer. But for those who used them for more than a decade the risk was 80% higher. The study also found that tumours were 2.5 times more likely to be on the same side of the head as the phone was held. The cancer of the auditory nerve, accoustic neuroma, showed a larger increase--3.5 times greater risk.

CELL PHONE RADIATION DOSAGE AND RESPONSE
All studies mentioned showed that an increase in cell phone radiation exposure also increases the likelihood of the adverse effect occurring.

In Repacholi's study of mice, the risk of lymphoma increased significantly the longer the mice were exposed to the radio waves.

In the research work done by Tice, Hook, and Roti Roti, the risks of genetic damage as measured by micronuclei formation increased as the amount of radiation increased.

In the three epidemoiological studies--two by Muscat and one by Hardell--the risk of tumors was greater in the areas of the brain near where the cell phone was held.

In Salford's study, the higher the radiation exposure level the rats were exposed to, the more damage was apparent in the blood vessels in the brain and the neurons.

THE BIG CANCER PICTURE
The test tube studies by Tice and Hook; the mouse study by Repacholoi and Selford; and the epidemiological studies by Rothman, Muscat, and Hardell all agree in that they suggest an increased risk of cancer among cell phone users. They fit together to form the beginnings of a picture that everyone can see. They perhaps don't form the complete picture yet, but there are enough already in place to see that there is cause fo genuine public health concern about cell phone safety.

According to Dr. Carlo, "The big picture is disturbingly clear. There is a definite risk that the radiation plume that emanates from a cell phone antenna can cause cancer and other health problems. It is a risk that affects hundreds of millions of people around the world. It is a risk that must be seen and understood by all who use cell phones so they can take all the appropriate and available steps to protect themselves--and especially to protect young children whose skulls are still growing and who are the most vulnerable to the risks of radiation."

MORE PIECES COMING
- In 2000, a team of Sydney researchers published a scientific hypothesis about how mobile phone radiation causes cancer. The report claims that the radiation generated by cell phones causes ongoing stress to the body cells, causing them to give off 'heat shock proteins (HSP).' The human cells sometimes release these proteins in response to injury or infection. Such a chronic activation of the heat shock response affects the normal regulation of cells, which could result in cancer.

- In 2002, cell biologist Fiorenzo Marinelli and his team at the National Research Council in Bologna, Italy, exposed leukemia cells to continuous radio waves similar to that of cell phones. The exposed cells had a higher rate of death than the controls initially, but after further exposure, a curious thing happened: instead of more cells dying, the exposed cells were replicating furiously compared to the controls. Genes that trigger cells to multiply were turned on in a high proportion of the cells. The cancer, although briefly beaten back, had become more aggressive. Marinelli suspects that the radiation may initially damage DNA, and that this interferes with the biochemical signals in a way that ultimately triggers the cells to multiply more rapidly.

SO WHY ARE CELL PHONES STILL AROUND?
Now with all the mounting evidence, the cell phone industry still maintains their position that cell phones are safe and have even begun marketing towards children. The governments have been slow in stepping in to warn people of any danger from using cell phones. Fortunately, health officials and experts in several European countries are taking the first steps, having issued public warnings to parents urging caution about kids and cell phones,

If the previous environmental issues involving tobacco, asbestos, and lead are any indication, it takes years and even decades to accumulate the amount of evidence that would produce a definite ruling. In the case of cigarette smoking, it took two decades of study and 100 years of consumer use to gather enough data to meet research standards to demonstrate the need for the U.S. Surgeon General's warning label on cigarette packs. Some experts say that in the case of cell phones, it will not take that long as data are coming in at a faster pace. But at the present the authorities can only urge people to exercise caution.

Replication of research is another problem. A study that comes out with a new finding generally does not gain immediate acceptance in the scientific community or the wireless industry unless another research lab has been able to replicate the work and the findings. The industry has cleverly perpetuated their position by creating an illusion of responsible follow up by always calling for more research.

When Dr. Salford published his study in 2003 showing that rat brain neurons were dying from exposure to cellphone radiation, he warned there might be similar effects in humans that over time could lead to degenerative diseases of the brain. His study was written off by the industry as a "novel" finding that needed to be replicated.

But achieving the scientific standard of replication can be complicated. Salford says if studies aren't absolutely replicated, providing an apples-to-apples comparison, there's wiggle room to dispute follow-up findings. Research studies require funding, and the wireless industry, after Dr. Carlo's revelations, have been reluctant to put money into more comprehensive research. As for governments, again many European governments are taking the responsible course by funding research, but the U.S. and Canada are lagging poorly.

In 1999, CNN's Larry King once again featured a man who brought a multimillion dollar lawsuit against cell phone manufacturers. This time the man, a Maryland neurologist, was himself diagnosed with brain cancer--again located on the side of the head where he held his cell phone. The suit was yet again dismissed, however, and the man died not long afterwards.

According to WHO report, 0.1 billion people have died from tobacco use in the 20th century, and 10 times as many will die in the 21st century. No one is suggesting that cell phones could cause as much casualties, but do we really want to wait and find out?

AIMING FOR RESPONSIBLE TECHNOLOGY
Unlike tobacco, the cell phone has become as an indispensable part of our lives as television and computer. It has enabled us to make a gigantic leap in the way we communicate with one another and has been credited widely with saving people's lives in emergency situations. Cell phones are here to stay, and perhaps rightly so.

The question is not how to stop people from using this ubiquitous device but rather how to make it safer. The first step always is to admit there is a problem, hence the industry and the government have to acknowledge the health risks inherent with the present technology. This way we can all find the proper solutions that we may more enjoy the benefits of its use without sacrificing our health and wellbeing.

lung cancer treatment breakthroughs Click here

ATTACK OF THE CELL PHONE ZOMBIES

"Zombies. man. They creep me out." -Dennis Hopper in the Land Of The Dead.

Book Excerpt:

By William Thomas

They are everywhere.

And they are winning.

Walk down virtually any metropolitan street, if you still dare, and you will discern with a jolt of alarm that no one around you is aware of each other’s presence or their surroundings as they shuffle past with the shambling gait of automatons. Hearing blocked by blaring or blathering headsets, heads bent over cell phones, iPods, palm pilots, multimedia players, text messagers and other hypnotic gadgetry, these walking dead with their vacant stares are so far departed from the reality around them they don’t even know they’re gone.

Cell phone zombies are proliferating everywhere. Spread by the most virulent contagion on Earth – the lust to own and continuously jack into wireless technology – addictive endorphin jolts sent by cell phones to the brain threaten agonizing withdrawal, even as their invisible emanations attack the frontal lobes, short-circuiting memory, awareness and cognitive thought.

Succumbing to the identical marketing strategies marshaled by the same advertising agencies pushing tobacco onto children, hordes of cell phone zombies as young as four-years-old are replacing normal human relationships with the cold calculus of truncated text messages, while disturbing their sonic space and interrupting conversations with friends and spouses to jabber with ghosts who are not even present, even as they spread the blight of their second hand microwaves among the last pockets of cell phone resistance.

Unlike the flesh-munching ghouls depicted in Hollywood horror flicks, which die and "reanimate" through the transmission of the Solanum virus through a usually gruesome exchange of bodily fluids, "voodoo zombies" are created by potions and spells cast by Haitian hougnan priests. 

"Zombie powder," as Max Brooks notes in his essential ZOMBIE Survival Guide, "contains a very powerful neurotoxin" not unlike the pervasive brain-eating chemicals added to food, soft drinks and other drugs – including (as we have seen elsewhere in this book) fluoride, aspartame and mercury. Separately and in combination, these insidious compounds are synergistically activated by pulsating electromagnetic emissions that mimic and override normal cellular functioning to destroy brain neurons and turn people into zombies.

Held entranced as their life force is leached away by devices eerily similar in size and shape to the voodoo dolls used to cast curses, cell phone zombies are especially dangerous, because unlike real Solanum-inducted zombies incapable of expressing feelings or speech, cell phone zombies can appear nearly normal when not jacked in. A real zombie, when it encounters you, "will home in like a smart bomb," Brooks explains, and start gnawing your face. A cell phone-voodoo zombie "will take a moment to try to figure out who or what you are."

Smiling a reflexive, unfelt apology for their intrusion – even "growling if hurt or provoked" as Brooks describes – many cell phone zombies "understand words; some even understand simple sentences [and] possess the ability to speak – simply, of course – and rarely for extended conversations."

TILL DEATH DO YOU APART
While not known to devour human flesh like "real" zombies, their mindless preoccupation with themselves, slavish fixation on meaningless distractions, and complete disregard for their rapidly deteriorating ecologic, economic and Constitutional environment threaten to spill from the worst zomboid infestations in the United States across the entire globe.

Certainly, the carnage caused by their mindless wars against non-threatening nations on which American zombies project their paranoia is consuming bone and gristle, hopes and dreams by the boxcar loads. With more than one million people – mostly children – killed in Iraq since 2003 by zombie-like GIs hopped up on anti-malarial pills and Dexedrine, fear, stress, exhaustion and the potent spells of patriotism and "revenge" for non-existent crimes, America’s blindly-following zombie legions are as dangerous to any country they overrun as the horrors described by Brooks in his best-selling account of the zombie wars. [World War Z]

CELL PHONE CARNAGE
Still, innocent bystanders and drivers can be at grave risk from deranged zombies talking on their cell phones while operating heavy fast-moving vehicles.

In cities that have not yet disarmed cell phone-brandishing drivers, the resulting daily carnage is as gory as any scene out of "Night Of The Living Dead". Stunned by an additional billion a year in claims for drivers using cell phones, North American insurers discovered that juggling phones while driving is not causing a 600% increase in accidents. Other drivers busy shaving, applying makeup, tuning radios, taming pets, pouring coffee, eating meals, retrieving dropped cigarettes, talking to passengers or attempting various sexual gymnastics are even more preoccupied.

Cell phones are much worse than lmerely dangerous driving distractions. Tests conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy found that using a cellphone turns drivers into zombies, severely impairing their memories and reaction times by disrupting signals to and within their brains. Hands-free mobile phones cause even more crashes because they typically emit 10-times more brainwave interference than handheld units.

Phoning from inside a car or truck is a bad call for everyone in the vehicle – especially children – because the surrounding steel structure amplifies cellphone emissions. The UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee reports, "using a mobile phone in a vehicle can accelerate radiation levels by up to 10-fold due to resonance effect."

For all drivers dialing out, Swiss researchers have found "changes of brain function induced by pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic fields outlast the exposure period." University of Toronto investigators report that the heightened probability of cracking up your car persists for up to a half-hour after completing a call.

That’s comparable to the risk of crashing while driving dead drunk exclaims Dr. Chris Runball, chairman of the B.C. Medical Association’s emergency medical services committee.

"Talking on a cell phone makes you drive like a retiree even if you're only a teen," reports the University of Utah, after finding that when motorists as young as 18 talk on their cell phones, "they drive like elderly people, moving and reacting more slowly and increasing their risk of accidents." Only hands-free phones were used in the study.

"If you put a 20-year-old driver behind the wheel with a cell phone, his reaction times are the same as a 70-year-old driver," says David Strayer, a University of Utah psychology professor and principal author of the study. "It's like instant aging." (Except studies have shown older, more experienced drivers are much more cautious – and safer – than testosterone-addled teens.) [AP Feb 2/05; Human Factors Winter/05]

Cell phone users are also as impaired as alcoholics. The quarterly journal Human Factors and Ergonomics Society reports that motorists talking on cell phones are actually more impaired than drunk drivers with blood-alcohol levels exceeding 0.08. It doesn't matter whether the phone is hand-held or hands free.

EM engineer Alasdair Philips of Britain’s Powerwatch looked for people under age 40 using cell phones more than four hours a day, and found them already retired as "unfit for future work" due to early onset dementia. Philips says, "I would rate over four hours per day cell-phone use as potentially as dangerous as drinking a bottle of spirits per day – only it will damage the user’s brain function rather than kidney function, and we don’t yet have brain transplants."

SAFETY TIP: Protect yourself from zombies operating motor vehicles! If you are driving and spot someone using a cell phone in a vehicle nearby, pull off the road and seek cover as soon as it is safe to do so. Or maneuver behind that driver and increase your distance accordingly. Do not open fire. "Self-defense" is not yet a legal defense for shooting drivers wielding cell phones.

PHONING FETUSES
If infants are born zombies, we are doomed. In the world’s most extensive, government-funded report on cell phone radiation, biomedical expert Dr. Stan Barnett described cell phone radiation effects on fetal tissue. After its release in June 1994 by a reluctant Australian government, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) described laboratory tests as far back December 1974 showing how neurons in the soft skulls of developing fetuses are extremely sensitive to heat during the process of cell division.

"The mother’s pelvic structure promotes deep RF radiation penetration and that radiation can be absorbed within the developing embryo or fetus," Dr. Barnett warned. The womb’s saline fluid is also highly conductive to Radio Frequencies and microwaves – and the EMF-conductive human body is 65% water-by-weight. [CSIRO June 1994; irf.univie.ac.at/emf]]

Whether cell phone radiation cooks the baby’s brain or destroys its rapidly dividing brain cells through microwave radiation, "the resulting neural deficit may not be restored," Dr. Barnett found. Perhaps not wanting to terrify the public, he neglected to add that this fetal brain damage from cell phones could easily lead to zombification. But he did add that though the fetus may continue to develop and appear normal, her brain functioning may be reduced for life. [EMFacts Consultancy Mar 26/03]

PhD Robert Kane points to corroborative research showing that all fetuses "showed growth retardation from cell phone exposure" – with female offspring exhibiting the highest risk of "impaired learning ability." When we recall that cell phone zombies speak largely in clichés, corporate jingles and broken sentences we can see how insidiously far-reaching this process has already gone.

Associated Bioelectromagnetics Technologists findings also show that RF exposure from cell phones and cell phone relay towers "is wholly correlated with the repeatedly documented increased incidence of autism – now reported by at least some researchers as greater than 1 per 100 newborn."

God have mercy on us all. If one in a hundred infants are not actually autistic but hard-to-differentiate zombies – we may find ourselves overwhelmed within another generation.

TOASTED TOTS
No one saw it coming. At first a cumbersome novelty, then a faddish convenience, the turning point in the zombification of humanity came in 2006, when corporate hougnan witch doctors casting microwaves began targeting the newborn. Already brain damaged by forced mercury injections in multiple infant vaccines, these newly arrived humans were taken home and bathed in electromagnetic smog invisibly spread by wireless routers, portable phones and intercom "sentries" placed in close proximity to their cribs.

The next step in their zombification came in putting cuddly "kiddy" phones capable of speed-dialing grandma and grandpa into the grasping hands of four year-olds. Soon, humans just out of the womb will no doubt be taking congratulatory calls at their mother’s breasts.

Some of us tried to resist. The MO1 developed by the toy company Imaginarium and telcom giant Telefónica in Spain prompted parental groups across Europe to demand a government ban on inflicting cell phones on children. Jóvenes Verdes, an environmental advocacy group for young Spanish persons, denounced the mobile telephone industry for "acting like the tobacco industry by designing products that addict the very young."

In Paris, where the curvy crimson-and-blue MO1 "beginner" mobile phone for 6-year-olds has overcome defenders by promising "peace of mind" – or maybe no mind at all – the French health minister has issued a public warning against "excessive" mobile phone use by young children. "I believe in the principle of precaution," muttered Monsieur Bachelot. "If there is a risk, then children with developing nervous systems would be affected. I've alerted parents about the use of mobile telephones because it's absurd for young children to have them."

Also concerned about the zombification of the young, Frank Barnes, a professor of engineering at the University of Colorado who led a study showing that children are at special risk from cell phones, told the press: "This clearly is a population that is going to grow up with a great deal of larger exposure than anybody else because the kids use the phones all the time."

TARGETING CHILDREN
Responding to relentless advertising spells and giveaways, the age of cell phone users continues to drop as fast as their IQ and attention span. In 2007, the average age of first-time "users" was 10. Within the next two years, International Data Corp forecasts the 9-and-under market will rack up an additional .6 billion in revenue for cell phone companies – and add another nine million child zombies in the United States alone.

Despite desperate rear-guard stands, the last holdouts against child zombification in the European Union are crumbling. As Dorjeen Carvajal reports, "Telephone use is also getting more precocious in Europe, according to a Eurobarometer survey of almost 1,000 children in 29 countries, most of whom had telephones after age 9."

The mobile telephone industry "is reaching deeper into saturated markets to tap customers with chubby hands capable of cradling both dolls and phones," Carvajal comments. As cell phone users in their ‘tweens and teens drive subscriber- growth everywhere, International Data Corp projects that by 2010, 31 million children could become zombies from holding miniature microwave ovens to their vulnerable soft brain tissue.

Targeting the youth market for zombification is especially cynical because children treat their microwave phones like a doudou or stuffed animal companion, the French mobile phone trade association AFOM revealed after surveying the habits of children too young to discriminate against dangers proffered by adults they trust.

Cell phone-toting tots also spend more of their parent’s money on the latest games, ring tones and wallpapers – and teens chatter even more than adults on their cell phones, greatly increasing cell phone company profits. Not to mention their own risks of developing allergies, senility, cataracts, learning disabilities, hyper activity disorders and brain tumors. [Intl Herald Tribune Mar 7/08]

Brain-damaging cell phone exposure continues through childhood. A 1996 study probing the "Electromagnetic Absorption in the Human Head and Neck for Mobile Telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz," conducted by the fabulously named Dr. Om Gandhi showed electromagnetic radiation from cell phones "coupling" even more alarmingly with the electrically active brains of children, than through the thicker carapaces of cumulatively compromised adults.

"I didn’t know at the time industry was targeting children as the next growth segment. Boy, they really got after me," Dr. Gandhi says, after he found that the thinner outer ears and skulls of children allow more energy from their cell phones to short-circuit delicate brain tissue. "The reason industry doesn’t like it," Gandhi explains – "They don’t want to lose this part of the market." [IEEE Transactions of Microwave Theory and Techniques Oct/96]

"We're pretty bullish on increased usage by teenagers," exudes Adam Guy, a senior analyst at the Strategist Group. "Usage penetration is exploding."

So is brain penetration. Guy’s gushing followed yet another study – this one published in the Journal of Cellular Biochemistry – found that heavy cell phone use can cause brain cancer and other diseases in children, as well as adults by interfering with DNA repair

Speaking directly to cell phone zombification and death, Dr. Theodore Litovitz, a biophysicist and professor emeritus of physics at Catholic University, explains: "Because stress proteins are involved in the progression of a number of diseases, heavy daily cell-phone usage could lead to great incidence of disorders such as Alzheimer's and cancer." [Reuters Apr 23/08; wirelessconsumers.org Dec03/01]

A ZOMBIE CASE HISTORY
In Claysburg, Pennsylvania, Greg Pozgar resisted buying a mobile phone for his then 12-year-old daughter, Morgan. "My biggest concern was whether my children were responsible enough to handle it," he said.

No one told him to worry about its emanations.

After receiving her first cell phone as a Christmas gift that year, young Morgan went on to become a champion of text messaging at age 13 in a national ,000 competition organized by the electronics manufacturer LG. This is the company that in 2007 made Europe’s "fashion handset of choice" by offering a "Chocolate phone" featuring an advanced touchscreen interface, instead of conventional keypad. [techdigestuk.typepad.com]

Competing Motorola’s V220's Tri-Band promises "network connection" between zombies-under-construction in countries becoming saturated in brain numbing electrosmog. The "stylish" V220 offers chic brain damage, exciting car crashes, no-fear-of-pregnancy sterility or classic cancer – in pink.

After hesitating over heath concerns, Disney has also jumped into the kiddy cell phone sweepstakes. Mattel markets a Barbie cell phone for girls 8 to 14. "Nine-year-old Trey Chapman loves the cool design, flashing lights and big buttons – one for mom and one for dad," chuckled USA Today. How well Ms. Chapman will enjoy her daughter’s reduced learning ability, asthma and other potentially debilitating maladies was not mentioned. [USA Today Mar 14/05]

Verizon has also responded with its popular "parent capable" LG VX8300. The "Chaperone" cell phone puts the "home" in Homeland Security. Now parents can harass their kids with text messages while tracking them through GPS satellite locators built into their continuously radiating cell phones. Every time a young family member enters or leaves an electronically designated "Child Zone", participating parents receive automated text messages informing them of their child’s movements – "So you can relax wherever you are." [verizonwireless.com; Intl Herald Tribune Mar 7/08]

Whether this home surveillance puts a crimp in the sexually transmitted diseases currently afflicting one in four American teenage girls, or their nearly one-in-three pregnancies before the age of 20 remains to be seen. [Reuters Apr 23/08]

The good news and the bad news is that cigarettes are being replaced by mobile phones. Unable to afford both addictions, teen smoking fell off sharply in 1996 – the same year mobile phone use skyrocketed among 15- to 17-year-olds. And no wonder, since cell phones are marketed by the same ad agencies using the same self-image come-ons that attracted teens to cigarettes – a sense of individuality and sociability, a desire to rebel, the need to bond with friends.
[British Medical Journal Nov 4/00]

Totally hooked, Morgan now sends and receives up to 7,000 text messages a month.

AVOIDANCE THE ONLY DEFENCE
After the Spanish Neuro Diagnostic Research Institute in Marbella discovered that a call lasting just two minutes can alter the natural electrical activity of a child's brain for up to an hour afterwards, Spanish doctors now fear that disturbed brain activity in children will lead to zombie-like impaired learning ability, as well as psychiatric and behavioural problems.

Brain scans allowed Dr. Michael Klieeisen’s team to see what is happening to the brains of cell phone users. "We never expected to see this continuing activity in the brain," he told the European press in new stories blacked out in the U.S. "We are worried that delicate balances that exist – such as the immunity to infection and disease – could be altered by interference with chemical balances in the brain."

The study coincided with a survey showing 87% of 11- to 16-year-olds own cell phones, with 40% of them spending 15 minutes or more talking on them every day. A troubling 70% said they would not change the use of their phone even if advised to by the government.

A British government adviser on mobiles, Dr. Gerald Hyland, finds the results "extremely disturbing." Parents who believe they are enhancing their children’s safety and social standing by sending them back to school with cellphones could be impairing their health and ability to learn, Dr. Hyland warns. "The results show that children's brains are affected for long periods even after very short-term use. Their brain wave patterns are abnormal and stay like that for a long period. This could affect their mood and ability to learn in the classroom if they have been using a phone during break time, for instance."

These same altered brain waves "could lead to things like a lack of concentration, memory loss, inability to learn and aggressive behaviour."

He could be describing zombies!

"There really isn't a safe amount of mobile phone use," Dr. Hyland continues. We don't know what lasting damage is being done by this exposure. If I were a parent I would now be extremely wary about allowing my children to use a mobile even for a very short period. My advice would be to avoid mobiles." [Mirror Dec 26/01]

AN OCEAN APART
It’s not like nobody knows how dangerous cell phones are. Perhaps because of earlier unpleasant experiences with vampires, European governments are intensely studying the effects of cell phones on otherwise normal humans. So far, their scientists have found everything from nervousness and headaches to brain tumors and even genetic damage resulting from cell phone radiation. [Independent Mar 30/08]

Led by Sir William Stewart, the famous British biochemist and president of the British Association for the Advancement of Science biomedical specialists, the Stewart Inquiry report on "Mobile Phones and Health" was released in April 2000. At a science conference in Glasgow, Sir William urged mobile phone makers to stop presenting their products as essential "back to school" items for children, whose easily penetrated skulls and longer lifetime use makes them particularly vulnerable to Radio-Frequency (RF) and microwave (MW) cell phone radiation. Sir William told the press he would not allow his grandchildren to use mobile phones. [Journal of the Australasian College of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine Sept /01]

In Sweden, where cell phones are being marketed to 5-year-olds, Olle Johansson, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm declares: "Parents should take their children away from that technology." [Dialing Our Cells by William Thomas]

In an interview in the Berlin Morgenpost, Wolfram Koenig, head of the Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz - the federal authority for radiation protection in Germany - urged companies not to target children in their advertising campaigns.

Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland, director general of the World Health Organisation, also told a major Norwegian newspaper that children should be discouraged from using mobile phones. The former Norwegian prime minister and popularizer of "sustainability" is also a licensed physician with a degree in public health. Making shorter calls does not help, Brundtland emphasized. [Microwave News Mar-Apr/02; Dagbladet Norge Mar 9/02]

France, Germany and the European Environment Agency also advise "minimal" handheld and hands-free cell phone use. But the Irish Doctors Environmental Association says flatly that young children should be stopped from using mobiles.
The Irish point to zombie-like side-effects from cell phone radiation, including excessive clumsiness, fatigue, confusion, tingling and dizziness. [Independent Mar 30/08; Irish News Feb 9/05]

Back across the Atlantic, where one in three teenagers uses a cell phone, "There is no research being done in the United States at the present time," Dr. Ghandi laments. "All of that research has been stopped because of industry."

Dr. Ghandi says this violates both the 1969 National Environmental Policy Act and the mandate of the Federal Communication Commission, which regulates RF transmitters on behalf of the industry. His latest heavy-duty paper – Thermal Implications of the New Relaxed IEEE RF Safety Standard for Head Exposures to Cellular Telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz – compares the relaxed RF exposure standards set by an American advisory group called the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers to standards now followed by the European Union.

Gandhi helped establish those regulations. As he explains, in the United States "these days in the committee (that sets the standards), one co-chair is from Motorola and the other is from the Navy, the military-industrial establishment, and they are suddenly loosening their standards. I compared the three standards to show the new standards are out of line. Too loose." [Uncensored (NZ) Nov 9/06]

HEAVY CASUALTIES SOON COME, MON?
If tobacco companies dared employ the same sophisticated neural "programming" techniques to sell cigarettes to toddlers as cell phone manufacturers do by using the same marketing firms – they would face a lynch mob. But by inflicting devices recently denounced by a leading cancer researcher as injurious as smoking on the very young, mobile manufacturers are turning the public into compliant, brain dead zombies.

And maybe just plain dead, as well.

Just-released findings by award-winning cancer expert, PhD Vini Khurana predict that cell phones will kill far more people than either smoking or asbestos. Smoking continues to cull some five million people worldwide every year, while asbestos exposure in England continues to claim as many corpses as road accidents.

After carefully reviewing more than 100 clinical studies showing that using "hands free" and regular cell phones for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer, the very capable Khurana – who has received 14 awards while publishing more than three dozen scientific papers over the past 16 years – concludes that malignant brain tumours resulting from cell phone use constitute "a life-ending diagnosis" for hapless users who now find themselves in an "unchecked and dangerous situation."

Professor Kjell Mild, of Orbero University, Sweden, who is a Government adviser and led the research, said that children should not be allowed to use mobile phones because their thinner skulls and developing nervous system made them particularly vulnerable. He and Professor Lawrie Challis, who led the MTHR research, want a revision of the emission standard for mobiles and other sources of radiation, which they describe as "inappropriate" and "not safe". [London Telegraph Oct 9/07]

Professor Khurana has become a Big Kahuna in the war against cell phone zombification after placing his considerable reputation behind the most damning indictment of cell phones to date. He warns emphatically: "Unless the industry and governments take immediate and decisive steps, the incidence of malignant brain tumours and associated death rate will be observed to rise globally within a decade from now – by which time it may be much too late to medically intervene."
[Independent Mar 30/08]

PROCESS OF ELIMINATION
It may already be too late.

A recent poll of 1,286 cellphone users has found that one in four cannot imagine life without their cell phone. The question remaining unasked is if they can imagine their lives continuing unimpaired with it.

Four in 10 people, particularly young adults, make cell phone calls to kill time as well as themselves, when traveling or waiting for someone they will invariably ignore. "We've got everything on my phone," boasts Mark Madsen, a 24-year-old college student from Chattanooga, Tennessee. "I use it mostly for the phone, but I also play video games and use the MP3 player. I pretty much use it all the time."

Like addicts everywhere, more than one in three cell phone subscribers say they are occasionally "stunned" by their user bills. Nevertheless, an increasing number of homes are speeding the zombification of their inhabitants by going completely wireless, with no landline at all. Public pay phones are also being removed, making it ever harder to avoid being owned by a brain-stunting cell phone.

This is good news for political leaders desiring a compliant populace for policies involving genocide, torture and concentration camps. It is also a boon to an illness industry feeding off human misery. On a New Zealand news show, Dr. George Carlo called marketing strategies aimed at children, "grotesque" after identifying as many as 50,000 new cases of brain and eye cancer attributable to cell phone use being diagnosed every year. (Mobile users who wear metal-frame glasses intensify the exposure to their eyes and heads). [IsraCast Technology News July 29/05]

Based on current epidemiological studies, that number will reach half a million cell phone cancer cases annually within the next two years.

WRONG ANSWERS
"We have never had this kind of impending risk to society," Dr. Carlo says. After heading a million cell phone study from 1993 through 2001, his finding – "that RF causes genetic damage" was welcomed by his cell phone industry sponsors.

Jerry Phillips worked with Ross Adey on similar research funded by Motorola beginning in 1991. After Adey came to similar conclusions as Carlo, "Motorola was adamant that Adey never mention DNA damage and radiofrequency radiation in the same breath," Phillips recounts. [WSW July 11/02; wirelessconsumers.org Dec03/01]

More than two decades ago, EMF researcher Alan Frey also wondered if headaches experienced by radio and radar operators – and now widely reported by cellphone users worldwide – were resulting from microwave-induced leakage of toxic molecules through the blood-brain barrier. "Headaches may only be the most obvious indicator of what is going on biologically," Frey warned back in the mid-1980s.

Studying blood-brain barrier changes since the late 1980s, neurologist Leif Salford of Lund University in Sweden is the leading expert in this research. "With improved detection procedures and new tracers, one of his most recent studies found changes in the rat brain chemistry after only two minutes of cellphone-level exposures; the rats' blood-brain barrier had failed, allowing proteins to enter the brain, and it is known that certain proteins which are normally present in blood, can cause nerve damage in the brain," writes Aussie cellphone rsearcher and reporter Stewart Fist. 

Professor Darius Leszcynski headed up the first two-year program looking at the effects of mobile phone radiation on human cells rather than those of rats at Finland’s Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. He, too found that cell phone transmissions open the blood-brain barrier to potentially brain-damaging toxins in the blood. [WSW July 11/02]

"We think we are on to something very significant," Professor Salford says. "It seems that molecules such as proteins and toxins can pass out of the blood, while the phone is switched on, and enter the brain. We need to bear in mind diseases such as MS and Alzheimer’s are linked to proteins being found in the brain."

So, he added, is Parkinson’s Disease. [Electronics Australia Magazine Feb/00]

Alzheimer’s mental and memory impairment, and the jerky motions of Parkinson’s are telltale zombie symptoms.

PROTECT THE MACHINES
"There is no proof that cellular telephones can be harmful," insist already infected FCC zombies on their "Kidszone" website. Blithely ignoring hundreds of alarming clinical studies, the Federal Communications Commission offers reassuring "Cell Phone FAQs" before going on to advise:

"Some of the places that you should never use your mobile phone are inside hospitals and airplanes. When you make or receive calls, electromagnetic waves are sent through the air. Hospitals have a lot of electronic devices that monitor patient's heartbeats and other things when they are getting surgery or when they are recovering from an illness. When electromagnetic waves try to go through them, the devices sometimes stop working."

The FCC does not say what happens when a much more subtle and sensitive instrument called the human brain is exposed to "electromagnetic waves… sent through the air". [fcc.gov]

LOST CONTACT
Max Brooks, best-selling chronicler of the first Zombie World War, informs us that "nzúmbe" is a Kimbundu, West African word for a dead person’s soul. "So what makes this living human a zombie?" Brooks asks. "The answer is simple: brain damage." [World War Z]

Few things damage brains as severely as chronic exposure to cell phone radiation. Leif Salford is concerned that spreading wireless technology is "drowning people in a sea of microwaves." Speaking directly to the threatened zombification of the entire human population, Salford says brain neurons that would normally not become senile until people reached their 60’s, are doing so now when people reach their 30’s because of cell phone exposure. [RFSafe.com Nov26/03]

Children and teens who become hooked on cell phones face a lifetime of learning disabilities, hyperactivity, high risk from driving accidents, greatly increased acute and chronic asthma, hearing loss, vision loss, sleep disorders and cancers – as well as classic symptoms of zombification, including loss of social skills, inability to think and reason clearly, loss of contact with their surroundings.

Faced with hard-to-detect zombies in their own ranks, alarmed British military scientists have discovered that every cell phone transmission disrupts brain functioning responsible for memory and learning. "Overuse" can cause forgetfulness and sudden confusion, as well as loss of the ability to concentrate, calculate and coordinate. [India Tribune Sept 17/04]

A leading Lloyd's of London underwriter refuses to insure phone manufacturers against the risk of subscribers developing cancer. The world’s most prestigious insurer also fears even more claims arising from zombified cell phone users who develop early onset Alzheimer's. [Observer Mar11/99]

NO MORE KIDS?
The coming cell phone cancer plague could terminate the cell phone zombie threat. But the cost to societies will be far greater than tobacco-related deaths. With more than 2 billion people – including at least 500 million children – using cell phones at present, the coming die-back of habitual cell phone users threatens the ability of nations to cope with bankrupt medical systems and overflowing hospitals and hospices. How will the trains – and everything else – run on time during socially dizzying disruptions caused by the sudden loss of key executives, city managers, government bureaucrats, tradespeople, professionals, as well as busy NGOs and activists to brain damage, electromagnetic sensitivity as acute as chemical sensitivities, and debilitating cancer?

RF/MW signals currently under discussion for inflicting on wireless classrooms throughout North America and the overdeveloped world will operate in the 2.4 GHz frequency range. This should do it. Because this cell-disrupting power density is two to three times higher than current cell phones. If schoolchildren survive this onslaught, plans are already underway to boost classroom radiation levels with "upgraded" technology emitting an even more lethal 5 GHz frequency range.[www.irf.univie.ac.at/emf]

Once turned into zombies and eventually culled by cell phones, these kids may be difficult to replace, because researchers at University of Szeged in Hungary have discovered that men carrying their cell phones on standby anywhere in their clothing throughout the day produce about a third less sperm than those who do not. Of the remaining sperm, high numbers were found to be swimming erratically – significantly reducing chances of fertilization. [BBC June 27/04]

Now put men made infertile by their cell phones together with fashionable beachgoing women who carry their cellphones in their bikini bottoms and the coming cell phone cull could become a crash. Especially if women are culled by bra-makers encouraging them to carry cell phones in their convenient, already cancer-prone cleavage.

Ironically, as more and more once-normal humans succumb to the seductive status and convenience conferred by cell phones, these extreme dangers become as self-perpetuating as the plague of brain-dead zombies already walking among us.

Vini Khurana urges everyone to stop using cell phones immediately. [Independent Mar 30/08]

LOW POWER INCREASES EFFECTS
Cell phone manufacturers often point to the low power output of their devices. But Dr. Franch and other medical investigators have found that the negative health effects of cell phones worsen with low dosage. This "simply reflects the fact that biological systems operate in a non-linear manner," writes Dr. Peter Franch in a co-authored landmark study, Effects Of 835mHz Exposure On Cell Structure And Function. "The higher frequency range" used in today’s digital cell phones "is also very close to the resonant frequency of human DNA, and as well as the resonant frequency of the human skull case."

Oops.

"Mobile telephones are arguably the most radiative appliance we have ever invented apart from the microwave oven and people are putting them by their heads – arguably the most sensitive part of the body," comments British biologist and mobile phone specialist Roger Coghill. "Human brains may absorb up to 40% of a cell phone’s RF energy, and as much as 60% of its microwave energy."

Sensitive to subtle electromagnetic harmonies, human brains and bodies depend on electrical impulses to conduct complex life-processes – including the ability to read, recall and respond to these words. Much like a boxer taking repeated blows to the head, rapidly pulsing cell phones signal permanent brain damage.

Cell phone researcher Dr. Peter Franch says unequivocally that brain and other "cells are permanently damaged by cellular phone frequencies." This cellular damage, Franch notes, is maximized at low dosage, and "inherited unchanged, from generation to generation."

"For the first time in history, we are holding a high-powered transmitter against the head," agrees Dr. Ross Adey. "When you talk on your mobile phone, your voice is transmitted from the antenna as radio frequency radiation between 800 MHz and 1,990 MHz… at a range that’s right in the middle of microwave territory. [WSW July 11/02]

Whipping anything back-and-forth 800 or 1,990 million times per second is bound to cause breakage in the double-strand DNA of human cells.

Sure enough, in Dr. Franch’s clinical study, both normal human cells and malignant brain tumor both cells were permanently damaged by cellular phone frequencies.

Dr. Henry Lai, a 20-year EMF researcher, and colleague Dr. N.P. Singh confirmed these conclusions by finding double-strand DNA breaks in test animals exposed for just two hours to pulsed, cell phone microwaves. Double-strand breaks do not repair themselves and can lead to mutation. An Adelaide Hospital study confirmed these findings after discovering that B-cell lymphomas doubled in mice within 18 months of one-hour daily exposure to power densities experienced by a cellphone user. B-cell lymphomas are implicated in 85% of all cancers.

Before having their research abruptly shut down by zombie officials, Dr. Lai’s experiments at the University of Washington placed rats in a pool of water where they learned to swim to a platform. After half the group was exposed to cellphone radiation, they became zombies and forgot the way to the platform. After it was removed, unexposed rats swam around bewildered, while the cellular-exposed group exhibited zero memory of it ever being there. [guardian.co.uk]

SAY WATT?
Even though irrefutable medical evidence shows that, in addition to sparking a host of other maladies, cumulative brain damage from cell phones can lead to impairment severe enough to turn users into the walking dead, so far cell phone "safety codes" only regulate radiation capable of burning skin. "Basically, Health Canada claims if it can’t cook you, it can’t hurt you," says Canadian EMF expert, Walter McGinnis. "It’s like saying cigarettes aren’t dangerous unless they burn you."

Setting the standards for cell phone exposure in Britain, the National Radiological Protection Board’s recommended radiation limits are expressed in Specific Absorption Rates that measure radiation averaged over one gram of tissue. The 1999 NRPB recommended limit was 10 milliwatts. One year later, proposed European guidelines of two milliwatts were five-times more restrictive. But on March 9, 2000 the China Consumers Association issued a worried warning about cellphone radiation after their tests found that some cell phones radiate up to 1,550 milliwatts per square inch.

Cellphone manufactures insist that "many studies" show their miniature microwave ovens are safe. But when pressed by the Washington Post to back up their claim, the cellphone industry could cite no studies showing no adverse impact from cellular telephones on human tissues, nervous systems or organs. As Dr. George Carlo confirmed, "The industry had come out and said that there were thousands of studies that proved that wireless phones are safe, and the fact was that there were no studies that were directly relevant."

Among more than 15,000 scientific reports on the cell phone hazards, at least 66 epidemiological studies show that electromagnetic radiation increases brain tumors in human populations. ["Cell Phone Convenience or 21st Century Plague?" by Dr. Nick Begich and James Roderick earthpulse.com]

THE CELL PHONE "SHIELD" SCAM
Can shooting yourself in the head be "safe"? Cellphone "shields" do not block microwaves, or change their harmful frequencies. If they did, cell phones could not communicate.

The only way to ensure complete protection against being turned into a zombie by cell phones is to avoid using them except in emergencies when no other voice communication is available – at the max, experts suggest, one or two minutes per month.

But cell phone manufacturers and sales rep zombies are working tirelessly to infect others by situating cell phone relay transmitters in town centers, schools and shopping centers. Remote natural settings especially attract towers festooned with microwave transmitters. Be wary! Faced with growing public opposition and some recent notable victories that have seen cell phone towers removed, their rote-reciting advocates are once again advancing their contaminating emissions by stealth – hiding cell phone relays in trees, eaves and even church steeples. Private landowners are also paid annual fees to site unassailable cell phone transmitters on their property capable of irradiating entire neighborhoods.

Incredibly shrinking mobile phones are being made small enough to fit inside a cigarette case by putting their antenna inside the phone. But this sharply reduces reception, which in turn is causing base stations to boost their RF and microwave power outputs back to size-challenged cell phones. [New York Times Mar 10/03]

SAFETY TIP: If a visitor’s cell phone picks up a strong signal where you live, find the offending tower and remove it. Or move.

Before you become a zombie, too.

Cell Phone Faceplates

Mycoolcell.com has added a new line to their already extensive selection of accessories. Joining their array of batteries, covers, skins, protectors, cables, hand-free equipment and much more is an assortment of Otterbox 4 iPhone cell phone covers for iPhone and Blackberry users.

Customers will want to protect the investment they have made in their phones by buying the best protection possible at a great price. Two styles of Otterboxrotectors are now available: the Commuter, and the Defender. Both will protect your device from scratches, drops or other shocks. Several color and model choices are available in each.

The Commuter phone protector is a little slimmer, and has a smooth finish, making it easy to slide into a pocket or handbag. The long-lasting cover is fashioned of three layers to provide great protection. the first layer is a film over the screen, which offers excellent defense from scratches and smears. The middle layer is a thin, silicone shock absorber, and the outer layer is beautifully colored, high-quality plastic. Port plugs keep the sensitive ports clean, yet accessible.
The durable, rugged Defender covers are also constructed of three layers. The inner layer of thin silicone film serves as screen protection. The second layer is a tough polycarbonate to guard against damage from jolts, shocks, and falls. The third layer is thin, resilient silicone to further protect the user's phone. The Defender also includes silicone port plugs to keep dust and dirt out.

High-school and college students are eligible for a 10% discount on all cell phone accessories simply by registering their name and school information using the form on the student discount page. This is a real boon to students in this economy, who are often working as well as attending school, and don't have much to spend. Batteries, cables and other hands-free equipment are often needed by students, as well as all the protectorscasespouches, skins and decals to protect and embellish their phones

Students will have fun browsing through all the accessories available from mycoolcell.com, but can also win prizes by producing their own youtube.com video. To enter, students simply make an attention-grabbing video demonstrating one of the cell phone accessories from mycoolcell.com, or by making an entertaining video review. The prize is one hundred dollars worth of merchandise from mycoolcell.com! This includes all of their phone and iPod accessories.

For those who aren't yet familiar with mycoolcell.com, this company also offers discounts to teachers, police, firemen, and other government workers and civil servants on their gov/edu pages. The company appreciates those who serve the country by working for various government offices, including local, county, and state offices, and those who serve by teaching the nation's children--the next generation of leaders.

Find all these great products and offers at mycoolcell.net, a company who cares about the community.